Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timo Legout vs Harold Van Raemdonck Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Legout vs Raemdonck analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Timo Legout vs Harold Van Raemdonck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Legout 0 - 0 Raemdonck
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Legout has won 49.04% of points on their second serve, while Raemdonck has won 41.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Legout, in recent form, has won 56.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Raemdonck has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.19% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Legout has saved 58.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Raemdonck has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Legout has won 60% of matches played (W/L 12/ 8), with Raemdonck winning 43.75% (W/L 7/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Legout has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 59/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13). Raemdonck has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Legout has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 12/ 7), where as Raemdonck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 7/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Legout has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.7 while Raemdonck has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Legout has won 86% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Raemdonck has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Legout has converted 50.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Raemdonck has converted 36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
708
Rank
406
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Form
58% (90-65)
Career Total W/L
44% (7-9)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Timo Legout vs Harold Van Raemdonck For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Legout VS Raemdonck
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timo Legout | Harold Van Raemdonck |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) | 25% (2/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (117/102) | 38% (29/47) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:43 | 1:6:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 202.45 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (452/713) | 54% (109/203) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (282/452) | 55% (60/109) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (128/261) | 41% (39/94) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (41/81) | 36% (9/25) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (299/679) | 41% (76/187) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (6/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Timo Legout Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Timo Legout
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tibo Colson
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Huens
Player
Timo Legout
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Timo Legout
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Mehdi Sadaoui
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve %
88%
(
15 of
17)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
20
Total Points Won
9
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Timo Legout
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Karue Sell
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Trevor Svajda
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Harold Van Raemdonck Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Bredschneijder
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Van Raemdonck
Player
Tim Hammes
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niklas Waldner
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(6) 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Romain Faucon
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Van Raemdonck
Player
Giannicola Misasi
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harold Van Raemdonck
Player
Alessandro Bellifemine
57%
(
67 of
117)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Legout Vs Raemdonck Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Legout are available here and Raemdonck photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
